Probate Judge Intelligence
Probate judges have significant discretion over will contests, trust disputes, conservatorships, and estate accountings. CCI reveals how individual probate judges approach contested matters and formal hearings.
14-day free trial · No credit card required · Pro plan $49/month
Built for probate
Why Probate Practitioners Love CCI
Will contest patterns: how judges handle summary judgment in will contests, undue influence claims, and capacity disputes.
Accounting scrutiny: which judges examine estate accountings closely and which routinely confirm without detailed inquiry.
Conservatorship intelligence: LPS vs. Probate Code conservatorship preferences, court investigator reliance, and how judges handle contested conservatorship hearings.
Judge profiles
Top Probate Judges
Profiles from the most-researched probate departments across California.
Judge Theresa M. Traber
Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Los Angeles
Judge Stephen M. Pulido
Hayward Hall of Justice, Hayward
Judge Benjamin T. Reyes, II
Wakefield Taylor Courthouse, Martinez
Judge Albert A. Erkel
Judge Jeffrey Erickson
Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse, Rancho Cucamonga
Judge Sunil R. Kulkarni
Downtown Superior Court, San Jose
What CCI tracks
Key Metrics for Probate
Will Contest Success Rate
Outcomes in contested will proceedings — by claim type (undue influence, lack of capacity, fraud, forgery).
e.g., Undue influence claims prevail in 31% of trialsAccounting Approval Rate
How often judges approve first and subsequent accountings without surcharge or reduction — and what they scrutinize.
e.g., First accounting approved without modification in 71%Conservatorship Grant Rate
How readily a judge grants contested conservatorship petitions and what investigation they require.
e.g., Contested conservatorship granted in 67% of petitionsTrust Contest Disposition
How judges handle trust modification petitions, no-contest clause enforcement, and trustee removal actions.
e.g., Trustee removal granted in 44% of removal petitionsStrategic intelligence
Probate Strategy Guide
Practical guidance for using judge intelligence in probate practice.
No-contest clause strategy varies significantly by judge. Understand how aggressively your judge enforces no-contest clauses before recommending a will or trust contest.
Accounting disputes often come down to whether the judge has an independent view on fiduciary compensation or defers to the requested amount. Review prior rulings before briefing fee disputes.
In conservatorship proceedings, the court investigator's report carries significant weight with some judges and is largely advisory for others. Know how much weight your judge places on the investigator.
Trust modification petitions under Probate Code section 15403-15404 have variable success rates by judge. Some judges liberally allow modification; others apply the changed circumstances test strictly.
Search judges
Find Probate Judges
Showing 6 of 6 judges
Judge Theresa M. Traber
Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Los Angeles
Judge Stephen M. Pulido
Hayward Hall of Justice, Hayward
Judge Benjamin T. Reyes, II
Wakefield Taylor Courthouse, Martinez
Judge Albert A. Erkel
Judge Jeffrey Erickson
Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse, Rancho Cucamonga
Judge Sunil R. Kulkarni
Downtown Superior Court, San Jose
Judge comparison tool
Compare Probate Judges Head-to-Head
Select 2–4 judges and get a side-by-side comparison of ruling patterns, grant rates, risk flags, and AI-generated strategic analysis — in seconds.
Get started
Know your probate judge
Probate outcomes are judge-dependent. Give yourself and your clients the intelligence advantage before every hearing.
14-day free trial · Pro plan $49/month · Cancel anytime