Skip to main content
CCI
Juvenile & Dependency

Juvenile & Dependency Judge Intelligence

Juvenile and dependency proceedings are among the most consequential in California courts. CCI profiles how judges approach WIC 300 detention hearings, reunification timelines, section 366.26 permanency decisions, and juvenile delinquency dispositions.

2,721 judges profiled
AI-powered analysis
Delinquency dispositions, WIC 300 findings, reunification patterns

14-day free trial  ·  No credit card required  ·  Pro plan $49/month

Built for juvenile & dependency

Why Juvenile & Dependency Practitioners Love CCI

Dependency detention hearing patterns: how judges weigh the detention criteria, what alternatives to removal they consider, and how quickly they order reunification services.

Section 366.26 termination of parental rights intelligence: how judges approach the beneficial relationship exception, sibling relationship exception, and Indian Child Welfare Act compliance.

Juvenile delinquency dispositions: whether judges favor diversion, probation, or commitment — and how they approach fitness hearings and direct file cases.

What CCI tracks

Key Metrics for Juvenile & Dependency

Detention Hearing Removal Rate

How often judges sustain detention in dependency cases at the initial and jurisdictional hearing stages.

e.g., Detention sustained at initial hearing in 71% of petitions

Reunification Service Grant Rate

How readily judges order reunification services at the dispositional hearing and what plans they find adequate.

e.g., Reunification services ordered in 83% of first-time petitions

366.26 Adoption Termination Rate

How often judges terminate parental rights at the section 366.26 hearing vs. selecting a less permanent plan.

e.g., Parental rights terminated in 79% of adoption-eligible hearings

Juvenile Diversion Grant Rate

How often judges grant informal or formal diversion in delinquency matters — by offense category.

e.g., Diversion granted in 64% of first-offense misdemeanors

Strategic intelligence

Juvenile & Dependency Strategy Guide

Practical guidance for using judge intelligence in juvenile & dependency practice.

1

Detention hearing preparation is critical because judicial momentum is hard to reverse. Know whether your judge accepts community-based alternatives to detention and what safety plans they find credible.

2

In section 366.26 hearings, the beneficial relationship exception requires showing both the existence and the benefit of the parent-child relationship — and courts vary on how they weigh competing interests. Research your judge's prior rulings on this exception before the hearing.

3

ICWA compliance is jurisdictional in dependency proceedings. Some judges scrutinize agency inquiry efforts aggressively; others accept minimal documentation. Know the standard before you file.

4

In delinquency fitness hearings, judicial assessments of criminal sophistication, prior delinquency history, and rehabilitative potential vary enormously. Build your fitness report evidence for the specific judge assigned to the matter.

Judge comparison tool

Compare Juvenile & Dependency Judges Head-to-Head

Select 2–4 judges and get a side-by-side comparison of ruling patterns, grant rates, risk flags, and AI-generated strategic analysis — in seconds.

Open Comparison Tool →

Get started

Know your juvenile & dependency judge

Juvenile & Dependency outcomes are judge-dependent. Give yourself and your clients the intelligence advantage before every hearing.

14-day free trial  ·  Pro plan $49/month  ·  Cancel anytime