Judge Tami R. Bogert

Judge Tami R. Bogert serves on the Sacramento County Superior Court and was appointed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. The available data on her judicial record is limited, but she has been publicly associated with a high-profile case involving a mentally disabled man who was held in jail for nine years awaiting a murder trial that never occurred, as documented in a December 2022 CalMatters investigative report. She was also referenced in a June 2024 Daily Journal article, indicating continued professional visibility in the legal community. The CalMatters investigation raises significant questions about case management and the handling of defendants with mental disabilities in her courtroom. The case drew public scrutiny regarding competency proceedings, prolonged pretrial detention, and the intersection of mental health and criminal justice. Attorneys appearing before Judge Bogert in matters involving mentally disabled defendants or competency issues should be aware that her handling of such cases has attracted investigative journalism attention. Because no ruling analyses, attorney observations, or additional case data are available, this profile is based solely on the limited public record. Attorneys should conduct independent research into her current docket assignments and any subsequent reporting before drawing broader conclusions about her judicial tendencies.

Given the absence of ruling analyses and attorney observations, attorneys cannot rely on established behavioral patterns for this judge. The one documented public data point — the CalMatters investigation into a nine-year pretrial detention of a mentally disabled defendant — signals that competency and mental health matters in her courtroom have been subject to external scrutiny. Attorneys handling cases with competency issues, Penal Code section 1368 proceedings, or mentally disabled clients should be especially thorough in documenting their advocacy and ensuring procedural compliance is airtight. Attorneys should approach appearances before Judge Bogert with careful preparation of the factual and procedural record, particularly in criminal matters. The public attention her courtroom has received in connection with the CalMatters report suggests that due process timelines and the rights of vulnerable defendants are areas where the record will be examined closely — both by the court and potentially by outside observers. In the absence of attorney feedback or ruling data, the safest approach is to prepare comprehensive written submissions, anticipate procedural questions, and avoid assumptions about her preferences based on general Sacramento County norms. Independent outreach to attorneys with direct experience in her courtroom is strongly recommended before any significant appearance.

• critical

  Research CalMatters Investigation and Any Follow-Up Reporting

  Review the December 2022 CalMatters article and the June 2024 Daily Journal reference to understand the factual and procedural context of the cases associated with Judge Bogert. This is the only substantive public record available and is directly relevant to understanding her courtroom history.

• critical

  Consult Attorneys with Direct Courtroom Experience

  Because no attorney observations are available in this profile, independently contact Sacramento County practitioners who have appeared before Judge Bogert to gather firsthand accounts of her preferences, demeanor, and procedural expectations.

• critical

  Prepare Thorough Documentation in Mental Health or Competency Matters

  Given the public record connecting her courtroom to a prolonged competency case, ensure all Penal Code section 1368 timelines, evaluations, and procedural steps are fully documented and compliant if your matter involves a mentally disabled or incompetent defendant.

• important

  Review Current Docket Assignment

  Confirm Judge Bogert's current department and case type assignment at the Gordon D. Schaber Sacramento County Courthouse, as docket assignments can change and affect the applicable local rules and procedures.

• important

  Review Sacramento County Local Rules

  In the absence of judge-specific preference data, ensure full compliance with Sacramento County Superior Court local rules and standing orders applicable to your case type.

• ›Arrive fully prepared on procedural timelines, as the public record reflects scrutiny of case management and delay in her courtroom.
• ›Treat all matters involving mentally disabled or vulnerable defendants with heightened procedural care and explicit on-the-record advocacy.
• ›Follow standard Sacramento County Superior Court courtroom protocols in the absence of judge-specific etiquette data.
• ›Do not assume informal accommodations — document all requests and agreements in writing given the absence of known preferences.