Judge Shereen J. Charlick

Judge Shereen J. Charlick serves on the San Diego Superior Court, having been appointed in late 2018. Her most defining professional characteristic is her extensive pre-bench career in federal public defense, a background that almost certainly shapes her judicial temperament and approach to matters involving individual rights, procedural fairness, and the treatment of parties who may be less sophisticated or less resourced than their opponents. Judges who come from public defense backgrounds tend to be acutely sensitive to due process concerns, skeptical of overreach by institutional actors, and attentive to whether all parties — particularly unrepresented or underrepresented litigants — are receiving a fair hearing. This does not mean she is reflexively pro-defendant or anti-prosecution, but rather that she is likely to hold all parties to rigorous procedural and ethical standards. A 2024 Daily Journal recognition noting that she 'goes out of her way' suggests that colleagues and practitioners have observed an above-average commitment to judicial engagement — possibly in the form of thorough preparation, accessibility, or proactive case management. This is a meaningful signal that she is not a passive arbiter but an active participant in the courtroom process. Because no ruling analyses or attorney observations are currently available in this dataset, the insights here are necessarily inferential, drawn from career trajectory and the limited public record. Attorneys should treat this profile as a baseline orientation and supplement it with direct courtroom observation before high-stakes appearances.

Given Judge Charlick's deep roots in federal public defense, attorneys should anticipate a judge who is procedurally rigorous and sensitive to fairness arguments. When representing institutional clients — corporations, government entities, or insurers — be especially careful not to appear dismissive of the opposing party's position or to rely on procedural technicalities as a substitute for substantive engagement. This judge is likely to see through arguments that prioritize form over substance, and may push back firmly if she perceives a party is using procedural leverage to disadvantage a less-resourced opponent. For attorneys on the defense side of civil or criminal matters, her public defense background may create a degree of natural alignment with arguments grounded in individual rights, proportionality, and equitable outcomes. However, do not assume sympathy — judges with public defense backgrounds are often the most demanding of defense counsel because they know exactly what thorough preparation looks like. Sloppy advocacy or underprepared arguments are unlikely to receive the benefit of the doubt. The Daily Journal recognition for going 'out of her way' suggests she values judicial engagement and may appreciate counsel who reciprocate with thorough briefing, honest representations about the record, and a willingness to engage substantively during oral argument rather than simply restating written submissions. Prepare for active questioning from the bench.

• critical

  Conduct Direct Courtroom Observation

  With no ruling analyses in the current dataset, attending one of Judge Charlick's hearings before your own appearance is critical. Observe her questioning style, how she manages oral argument, and how she responds to different advocacy approaches.

• critical

  Prepare for Active Bench Questioning

  Given signals of high judicial engagement, prepare to answer substantive questions about every aspect of your filing — facts, law, and equitable considerations. Do not assume the written brief will speak for itself.

• important

  Audit Your Filings for Procedural Fairness

  Review your motions and arguments to ensure they engage the merits and do not rely disproportionately on procedural technicalities, particularly if opposing counsel represents an individual or less-resourced party.

• important

  Research Her Federal Public Defense Background

  Review the November 2018 San Diego Union-Tribune coverage of her appointment for additional biographical detail. Understanding the specific cases or issues she handled in federal public defense may reveal substantive areas of expertise or sensitivity.

• important

  Review the 2024 Daily Journal Recognition

  Obtain and read the full 2024 Daily Journal article referencing her conduct. The specific context of 'goes out of her way' may reveal concrete behavioral patterns — whether in case management, litigant treatment, or legal analysis — that are directly actionable.

• Nice

  Prepare Honest, Balanced Representations

  Judges from public defense backgrounds often have finely tuned credibility detectors. Prepare to acknowledge weaknesses in your case proactively rather than waiting to be confronted with them, as this approach tends to build rather than undermine judicial trust.

• ›Arrive fully prepared to engage substantively — this judge's recognized engagement style suggests she will ask probing questions and expects counsel to have real answers, not deflections.
• ›Treat all parties and their counsel with visible respect; a judge with a public defense background is likely sensitive to power imbalances in the courtroom and may react negatively to dismissive or condescending conduct toward opposing counsel or unrepresented parties.
• ›Be concise and direct in oral argument — federal practice norms, which she is familiar with, tend to reward precision over rhetorical volume.
• ›If you do not know the answer to a bench question, say so clearly and offer to submit a supplemental brief rather than speculating; credibility is a long-term asset before any engaged judge.
• ›Acknowledge the other side's strongest arguments before explaining why your position prevails — this signals intellectual honesty and is likely to be well-received by a judge who has spent a career making difficult arguments in hard cases.