Judge Josh R. Freeman Stinn

Judge Josh R. Freeman Stinn was appointed to the Los Angeles Superior Court by Governor Gavin Newsom on November 10, 2021. His pre-bench career was concentrated at Loeb & Loeb LLP, a prominent national law firm known for its entertainment, media, and transactional practices, where he held positions beginning in 2006 and rose to Senior Counsel by 2019, serving in that capacity until his appointment. He also worked as an External Campaign Manager at Kaufman Campaign Consultants in 2006, indicating early professional experience outside of law firm practice. Because no ruling analyses, attorney observations, or ingested content are currently available for Judge Freeman Stinn, no patterns in judicial philosophy, ruling tendencies, or courtroom management can be documented at this time. The profile data establishes his background as a long-tenured associate and senior counsel at a large firm, which informs the general professional context of his legal training, but no specific judicial behavior can be attributed to him from the available data. Attorneys appearing before Judge Freeman Stinn should treat this profile as a baseline and supplement it with direct courthouse intelligence, recent docket review on the Los Angeles Superior Court's online portal, and consultation with colleagues who have appeared before him since his 2021 appointment.

No ruling analyses or attorney observations are available to support specific strategic guidance tailored to Judge Freeman Stinn's demonstrated judicial behavior. Attorneys should conduct independent research through the Los Angeles Superior Court's online case management system to review recent tentative rulings and minute orders from his department, which will provide the most reliable current intelligence on his procedural preferences and substantive tendencies. Given his background as Senior Counsel at Loeb & Loeb LLP — a firm with a strong transactional and litigation practice — attorneys can expect familiarity with sophisticated legal arguments and complex commercial matters. However, no specific argument styles, motion preferences, or ruling patterns have been documented in the available data, and attorneys should not rely on inferences from firm background alone when preparing for appearances. The most reliable preparation strategy at this stage is to review the Local Rules of the Los Angeles Superior Court, the standing orders for his specific department if published, and to speak with attorneys who have recently appeared before him. Checking the court's tentative ruling system before any hearing is a standard and critical step.

• critical

  Review Department Standing Orders

  Check the Los Angeles Superior Court website for any published standing orders or department-specific rules for Judge Freeman Stinn's courtroom. These orders govern procedural requirements and are binding on all parties.

• critical

  Search Recent Tentative Rulings

  Use the Los Angeles Superior Court's online tentative ruling system to identify any published rulings from his department. Even a small sample of tentative rulings will provide concrete insight into his analytical approach and writing style.

• important

  Consult Attorneys With Recent Appearances

  Seek out colleagues or local bar contacts who have appeared before Judge Freeman Stinn since his 2021 appointment. First-hand courtroom observations are the most reliable intelligence source given the absence of documented data in this profile.

• Nice

  Review Loeb & Loeb Practice Context

  Loeb & Loeb LLP is known for entertainment, media, real estate, and commercial litigation. If your matter falls within these areas, be prepared for a judge with substantive familiarity with industry-specific legal concepts.

• ›Follow all Los Angeles Superior Court Local Rules strictly, as no department-specific deviations have been documented for this judge.
• ›Arrive prepared with thorough knowledge of the record; his large-firm background reflects an environment where factual and procedural precision is expected.
• ›Check the tentative ruling system before any hearing and be prepared to address the court's stated reasoning directly.
• ›Treat all courtroom interactions with professional formality consistent with a judge who spent his career in a major national law firm environment.